PulseTIO
HomeResearch & EvidenceDevelopment of a patient-reported experience measure for temporomandibular disorders: exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing
Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology2026Patient ExperienceCommunication

Development of a patient-reported experience measure for temporomandibular disorders: exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing

Authors:Dina Taimeh, Richeal NiRiordain, Stefano Fedele, Rachel Leeson
Sample Size: 139 patients

Abstract & Study Summary

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of a newly developed patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for individuals with painful temporomandibular disorders. This PREM was developed to assess the experience of patients while receiving healthcare. STUDY DESIGN: This study had a cross-sectional design. A total of 139 patients completed the PREM following clinical visits, with 50 repeating it 2 weeks later. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Cronbach α coefficient, and interclass correlation coefficient were utilized to assess the structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, respectively. RESULTS: EFA identified a 5-factor structure with 21 items. These domains were "emotional support," "respect for patient centred values," "information, communication and education," "access to care," and "coordination of care." The Cronbach α was 0.7285, indicating good internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.732, reflecting good test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The PREM is a brief tool, which shows potential in assessing patient experiences in facial pain services. It may also support audits and clinical research. Further psychometric validation is recommended.

Key Findings & Evidence Takeaways

  • ✓These domains were "emotional support," "respect for patient centred values," "information, communication and education," "access to care," and "coordination of care." The Cronbach α was 0.7285, indicating good internal consistency, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was 0.732, reflecting good test-retest reliability.
  • ✓CONCLUSIONS: The PREM is a brief tool, which shows potential in assessing patient experiences in facial pain services.
  • ✓It may also support audits and clinical research.
  • ✓Further psychometric validation is recommended.

Why This Matters for Clinics & Healthcare Organizations

Provides empirical clinical evidence from Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology regarding Patient Experience outcomes.

Original Research Source & Citations

Peer-Reviewed Journal

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology

Year: 2026

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/j.oooo.2026.01.007

Resolve DOI
PubMed CitationView on PubMed
Primary Publisher LinkPublisher Archive
Research Keywords & Subject Index
Factor AnalysisStatisticalReproducibility of ResultsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTemporomandibular Joint DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesPatient Acceptance of Health CareFacial PainPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesHumanspatient experiencecommunication

Related Research

Complementary scientific studies on Patient Experience.

Explore Library

Explore more Patient Experience Research

Access peer-reviewed studies on satisfaction, hospital margins, Google review dynamics, and patient retention.

View Full Evidence Library →